NeonatalNews.Net, newsletter of the Section of Neonatology at Baylor College of Medicine Link to NeonatalNews.Net Home Page Link to Texas Children's Hospital Home Page Link to Baylor College of Medicine Home Page NeonatalNews.Net, newsletter of the Section of Neonatology at Baylor College of Medicine
Link to NeonatalNews.Net Home Page
Link to (Portatada de) NoticiasNeonatales.Net
Link to Section of Neonatology Home Page
Link to Baylor College of Medicine Home Page
Contents
Spotlight
The Front Line
Breaking News
Editor's Corner
Research Highlights
Back Page

Material provided within these pages is for information purposes only and is not intended as medical advice or instruction. For medical advice or treament, individuals must consult their own physician or other health care provider. The views and opinions expressed in these pages are not necessarily those of Baylor College of Medicine, its departments or any of its affiliated hospitals or other health care providers.

Editorial Board

Michael E. Speer, MD
Professor of Pediatrics
Editor

Marlane J. Kayfes
Managing Editor

Lisa M. Adcock, MD
Gerardo Cabrera-Meza, MD
Kenneth Due
Joseph A. Garcia-Prats, MD
Karen E. Johnson, MD
Heidi E. Karpen, MD
Leigh McLeroy
Leonard E. Weisman, MD

Breaking news

Update on Group B Streptococcal Screening

by Michael E. Speer, MD

Since 1993, the incidence of early onset group B streptococcal (GBS) disease in the neonate has progressively fallen [see Figure]. Evidence now validates prenatal GBS screening over the risk-based approach previously recommended. In the mid-1990s, Connecticut began a screening-based program. There the incidence of early-onset GBS disease declined from 0.6 cases/1,000 live births (1996) to 0.2 cases/ 1,000 live births (1999).

Although the culture-based methodology is superior, concerns exist regarding potential adverse or unintended effects of GBS prevention efforts. These include allergic or anaphylactic reactions to agents used for intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis, emergence of GBS strains resistant to standard therapies, and increasing incidence of serious neonatal infections caused by pathogens other than GBS, including antimicrobial-resistant strains. Fortunately, none of these concerns has proven true related to penicillin prophylaxis. However, increasing resistance of GBS to erythromycin and clindamycin (up to 25% and 15%, respectively) has been documented. Thus, use of those antibiotics is not recommended in patients allergic to penicillin unless the bacterium has been proven to be sensitive. In cases of elective cesarean section without labor or ruptured fetal membranes, intrapartum prophylaxis of the mother is not recommended regardless of culture status. All of the GBS recommendations, are on the CDC web site:

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5111a1.htm#fig2

Figure - Incidence of early- and late-onset invasive group B streptococcal disease; selected Active Bacterial Core surveillance areas, 1989-2000, and activities for prevention of group B streptococcal disease.

*ACOG=American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; AAP=American Academy of Pediatrics

Source: Prevention of Perinatal Group B Streptococcal Disease. MMWR 2002; 51(RR11): 1-22 as adapted from CDC. Early-onset group B streptococcal disease, United States 1998-1999. MMWR 2000;49:793-6; and Schrag SJ, Zywici S, Farley MM, et al. Group B streptococcal disease in the era of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. N Engl J Med 2000;342:15-20.

| NeonatalNews.Net | NoticiasNeonatales.Net | Section of Neonatology | Baylor College of Medicine |

Copyright © 2003 All Rights Reserved.
Section of Neonatology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, Texas 77030 USA
Privacy Notices

URL: http://www.neonatalnews.net/URL: http://www.neonatalnews.net/March-03/Breaking.htm
Created: April 11, 2003
Last update: March 31, 2003

Last modified: September 7, 2006